Search for: "Charles v. Federal Communications Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
Two state utilities commissions and two community interest organizations petition for review of several rulemaking decisions made by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) in connection with FERC's implementation of the new § 216 of the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
§1512, applies to "Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person, with intent to ... prevent the communication by any person to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense .... [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am
Smith (Federal Jurisdiction; Indian Country Land Status) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlUnited Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:21 am
§ 1512(a)(1)(C), makes it a crime “to kill another person, with intent to. . . prevent the communication by any person to a [Federal] law enforcement officer” of “information relating to the . . . possible commission of a Federal offense. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
Houston Federal Criminal Lawyer Charles Johnson may be able to intervene on your behalf even before an arrest is made. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:33 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act)Charles P., Starlene M. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm
Fort Peck Tribes (Right to Counsel) Charles v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:22 am
Section 332(c)(7)(B)(ii) of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires that state and local governments act on an application to site a wireless communication facility “within a reasonable period of time,” and Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) creates a cause of action for an applicant to challenge any such failure to act. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:36 pm
My memory of the CliffsNotes to the Dickens classic aside, fortunately, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) is, as its Chairman recently described it, “poised” to provide clarity on what types of devices fall within the definition as part of an ongoing declaratory ruling proceeding. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:17 pm
See Hy Cite Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. _ (2010) [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
Edwards, Charles Fahy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Harold Leventhal, Carl McGowan, E. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 10:36 am
Appellate Legend Charles A. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:17 pm
Stock Price Evidence from FTC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
It has the jazzy title Criminal Defense Victories in the Federal Circuits. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
Charles Blustein OrtmanRobert Bresenhan, Jr.Barbra Casbar SipersteinSheila Kenny, Esq.Joseph A. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:59 am
Although the complaint alleges that Devine and Neiman induced Allen to lend money beginning in 2000, the continuing wrong doctrine (see Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, 819; Barash v Estate of Sperlin, 271 AD2d 558) applies such that the six-year statute of limitations “began to run from the commission of the last wrongful act” (Community Network Serv., Inc. v Verizon NY, Inc., 39 AD3d 300, 301). [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:52 pm
Professor Charles Jalloh Professor Charles Jalloh, also a member of the ILC, noted the tremendous progress of the Commission on this significant project. [read post]
